University Web Developers

University Web Developers

For those of you who have recently updated your site or going through an update (since Jan 2008), do you support IE6?
Why? Why not?
If not, how do you handle those few visitors that still use it? Browser upgrade suggestions? A supported browser copy on a page or footer?

We're leaning towards only supporting Safari 3+, FF 2+, and IE7+.
Thoughts?

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I unilaterally declared that my office (a one man web office for a 26,000 page site) will not support IE6. It's a resource issue, not to mention it's running at its EOL. I simply don't have the time to stop and test every little thing in it and deal with its quirks and flaws. Usually, these are elements of progressive enhancement, and I simply will do some browser detection and have the page modify itself accordingly (easy with our CMS) to not serve enhanced code to IE6. Sometimes it's actual layout stuff. I simply can't care, too many bigger fish to fry.

When users complain, I tell them to get Firefox. If that doesn't work, I politely explain that it's not a reasonable demand to support such an old piece of software now given our resources, and if they want it to change, feel free to write our VP asking that more manpower be added to the office. And then go get Firefox. Has it gotten me some dirty looks and angry emails? Yep. But ultimately, no one challenges the matter, because at least in our case, I'm right, heh.

Reply to This

We still support IE6 as about 23% or our total visits are still IE6. That is too large of a percentage to totally not support it. We try to get it as exact as IE7 and FF2+ but in some cases we have to settle for something that is not as perfect.

The browsers that we don't support are those that are less than 5%, so we still have a ways to go before we will officially tell people that it is not supported.

That being said, if our campus users call with problems and they are on IE6 we do try and push them to a newer browser.

Reply to This

We also decided to minimally support IE6 (visually) in a recent redesign. Unfortunately, around 14% of our users still use IE6, so we didn't feel that we could totally ignore it. Our org doesn't really have a "browser strategy" yet, so for now, we're just making these decisions on an ad hoc basis.

We were using PNGs for banner and rounded corner images, so we just made .gif equivalents, and used CSS hacks to hide the PNGs from IE6, and separate CSS rules to display the .gifs. It doesn't look extremely pretty, but it's functional.

Reply to This

For the past three years we've seen IE6 usage go from 22% to 9%.

There are several factors for us: resources, not wanting to use hacks, and an expectation that we'll see a continued decrease in IE6 usage.

Reply to This

For us this is really an analytics question. Our IE6 users are still too many in number to ignore. It is getting closer though.

Reply to This

We've still got 10%+ IE6 usage, so I think we'll have to hold out a little longer. *sigh*

Apart from the percentage, I think it's important to think about exactly who that small percentage may represent. My guess is that people who haven't updated from IE6 are a combination of:

1. Corporate users who are stuck on IE6 for standardization reasons.
2. Older people who think IE6 is the internet.
3. Non-technical people who don't know or can't be bothered.

My point: From a student recruitment and admissions standpoint, IE6 probably isn't that important, since teenagers aren't likely to be in these groups. From a fund raising, business relations and alumni standpoint, you may want to keep things running in a terrible, abomination of a browser for just a little bit longer.

Reply to This

Ha ha ha. We support IE6 because our IT office won't support IE7 or 8 for campus users yet.

Reply to This

I minimally support IE6 for layout issues, and make try to not to use PNGs. I don't find that limiting. Constraints foster creativity.

I also added a conditional If IE 6-7 statement at the footer of our site suggesting that those users upgrade to Firefox, Safari, or Chrome.

I'd love to ditch it entirely, and I can see that from our analytics, the vast majority of our IE6 users are here on campus, possibly in our building.

How about this as a question: At what percentage do we stop supporting it?

Reply to This

I think we've had this discussion (or a similar one - maybe it was about supporting IE8) recently. Our site still gets a decent amount of traffic from IE6 users, so we minimally support it. I will check new pages and major updates in IE6, and will correct major issues if they appear. We use quite a few transparent PNGs in our layout, as well, but I've implemented iepngfix.htc through conditional comments for most of those. In the few cases where that's not feasible, I've made GIF equivalents for use in IE6.

When building the site, I even developed it to minimally support IE5, as there were still about 5% of our visitors using that. However, that number has declined to only one or two visits each month since the redesign, so I've stopped even checking the site in that browser.

Reply to This

We support IE6, IE7, and FF. I wish we could drop IE6, but a good 20% of users still use it.

Reply to This

RSS

Elsewhere

Latest Activity

I agree with Nathan - you do not want flash in your HTML email. You can have the HTML email look like the start of a movie.. or whatever graphics you want in there.. but when clicked - the user should be taken to a web site where a full web browse...
18 hours ago
Todd Sanders from the University of Wisconsin - Green Bay, provides this job description.
19 hours ago
Rick Hill joined DNI's group
For folks who use (or are interested in) Hannon Hill's Cascade Server CMS product
yesterday
How are you looking to point users to the Flash file? I don't know the most recent stats on Flash visibility through email clients but I remember in the past the argument was against sending a pure Flash file through email. Instead the suggestion ...
yesterday
We recently tested Joomla vs. Drupal and arrived at some of the same conclusions as previous posters. In the end, with as large as we need the site to be, we settled on Drupal. It has yet to be seen if we've made the right decision. I'll get back ...
yesterday
It's not for our school, but it is a pretty decent description of a social media intern position: https://jobs.scottrade.com/viewjob.html?optlink-view=view-12523&ERFormID=newjoblist&ERFormCode=any
yesterday
Heather Jackson added a discussion
We're planning on sending out a Flash-based Christrmas greeting via email. I'm wondering what maximum file size we should be aiming for. (i.e.
yesterday
We're working on this with a school right now. I'll share what we end up at!
yesterday
If you plan to attend the 2009 Symposium for Marketing of Higher Education being hosted next week by the American Marketing Association in Boston, please stop by and hear Lance Merker, CEO of OmniUpdate, discuss student expectations about the coll...
yesterday
Here was mine (with a hearty assist from Jessica Krywosa of Suffolk University): This position will allow a student the opportunity to help shape and promote online and social media community experiences for the college. The social media intern s...
yesterday
I do all 'main university' type postings in FB and Twitter and act as the 'voice' of the accounts adding personal touches here and there, such as personal questions or greetings. Our strategy includes adding admins from various parts of the unive...
yesterday
Jessica is beat from the Stamats conference!
yesterday
I dont know if its served me well - its only been a few months - but I have only a short descriptive 'graph that I used. This position allows a student the ability to help promote and shape the university online community experience. By providing...
yesterday
Tish, Eloine and Maggie Corbin joined University Web Developers
yesterday
As I review admissions pages and applications, I've discovered there are few admissions pages that have an easy to find call to action to apply. The norm seems to be scanning a lot of text to find the "to apply" choice.
yesterday
John, Not sure if you've seen this already, but check out Common Admissions Application. Looks like a number of higher ed schools across the country use it.
yesterday
Justin, just got through with an OmniUpdate CMS demo. The application is unbelievable. It is awesome. If we had the money we would right the check right there. What is cool about the company is they are trying to work with us. I think that this sp...
on Friday
Sam, beside Joomla I have used DotNetNuke also and I have experienced the same type of issues with DNN. Installation. I have had huge issues and a lot of wasted time trying to install DNN and trying to get it up and running. Once I have it install...
on Friday
Darren Ladner added a discussion
I need a new calender of events type software. Right now we were using the open source vtcalender system until it broke. This system has been nothing but problems. The previous web designers were the ones that put this calender system into use. Wh...
on Friday
I sent them an email looking for a baseline cost but have not heard back from them yet. We are currently debating whether or not this is an in-house project. Though I'm more prone to go with the vendor if they offer extensibility we don't have t...
on Thursday

An adjunct to UWEBD. UWEBD has been in existence for more than 10 years and is the very best email discussion list on the Internet, in any industry, on any topic.

About

Terry Calhoun Terry Calhoun created this social network on Ning.

© 2009   Created by Terry Calhoun

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!