University Web Developers

University Web Developers

We are in the initial stages of project planning for a web CMS implementation in FY2014.  As we begin to develop our project planning documentation, we are somewhat struggling to come up with meaningful, measurable metrics for determining success of our project.  So far, we are considering measuring: 1) the percentage of trained content managers that are "actively" using the system once implemented, and 2) the percentage of trained content managers who are "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the usability and functionality of the CMS, based on their responses to an online survey.

Can anyone else share some metrics they have used to measure the success of a CMS implementation?

Thanks for your help~

Chris

Tags: CMS, management, metrics, project

Views: 592

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Chris,

I have some questions to consider when determining the best way to measure success of a new cms. I'll send you an email that may help.

Annette

Thanks, Annette!

Hi Annette -- any chance you could share a version of your questions here? It might be very helpful to those of us contemplating CMS changes and upgrades. Thanks!

Hi Daniel,

The measurement of success is based on the reason for the change of CMS in the first place. Is the CMS upgrade part of an overall redesign and updated information architecture? Or is it a stand alone project? Are you moving from having no CMS into one? Are you moving from one certain CMS to another due to contributor difficulties, development standstill or poor service?

Basically, it depends on what you are looking to measure and what your definition of success is being based on.  Also, you can compare the site/page updates before and after CMS implementation.

We get hired as a consultant many times to help zero in on all the pain points within and organization, analyze data, conduct user ability audits, and consolidate a schools goals which we then recommend a CMS that is best suited for their needs.   Since we have an extensive history of experience in higher ed our insight and contribution is quite valuable. It allows for our clients various departments to be heard and considered before making such a major decision.

Hope that helps! 

As Annette said, it depends on why you're doing it. What are the problems that need to be solved, and what are the outcomes that can be measured? I'm planning to switch to a CMS from not having one this coming year, and most of our issues are around quality control. I'll be looking at things like broken links, misspellings, web writing quality and internal standards compliance, information accuracy, etc., as well as bottom line metrics like conversions.

We are also transforming our web this year with new visual design system and CMS.  We should definitely all collaborate on drivers, best-practice, planning, and execution.

Our program has three high level objectives:

  • Provide an unparalleled authoring and publishing experience
    • Give author more powerful and easier to use tools
    • Remove IT from all publishing tasks
    • Remove on technology knowledge requirement from the authoring process
    • Measures: volume of new content and updated content, IT ticket rates, 
  • Deliver leading edge user experiences
    • Improve "findability" of content
    • Improve UX tailored to persona type
    • Be exceptional across multidevices
    • Measure: visitors, pageview, time on page, bounce rates, mobility satisfaction,content reuse,etc
  • Build a strong web builder community
    • Train users on UX, usability, content strategy, etc
    • Audit and support better content and UX
    • Measures: active users, training volume, self-support rates, seminar attendance,

I've done both. With positive results. And you can adjust according to feedback. 

How are you defining "actively using" the system? 

What constitutes a  "trained" content manager? And of course, what determines "satisfaction?"

Have you thought about it from an output perspective? How many web pages effectively published/maintained? 

Thanks to all for your responses.  

George-

"Actively using" the system means: that content manager's pages are being maintained/updated (evidenced by no outdated content) and they aren't coming to IT for those updates.

A "trained" content manager means they've gone through whatever training we and/or the vendor has provided them and they are "actively using" the system as defined above.

"Satisfaction" is measured via a post-implementation online survey of the content managers.  The question(s) will provide a 5 point range of responses, from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied".

We hadn't necessarily thought about it from an output perspective, not knowing a good way to measure/quantify that.  I struggle with the true worth or value of an absolute number like "web pages effectively published/maintained".  Couldn't you have a high number for that and still have users really unsatisfied with the process/system for getting their pages updated?

The amount of post-training assistance hours that are needed with content managers may be a helpful metric to track as well. You can (perhaps) learn something about both user "activity" and success of the training component.

Number of page revisions and length of days in approval processes may be good metrics to look at quarter over quarter, or whatever interval makes sense for you- In other words, as we progress, did we see the former increase and the latter decrease? etc.  I think those might help you make statements about the relevance and up-to-date-ness of your content.

What are the overall goals of the project, aside from implementation. Why bring a new CMS on board ? Was it to make content upkeep more effective? To address back end issues? Look to tie metrics to those higher goals as well.

While it's generally not the primary justification for implementing a new web CMS, it's almost inevitable that doing so will lead to changes in your consumer-facing web design regardless of what your current site architecture may be. That being that case, it's also helpful to include that perspective in your project objectives. What can you achieve along those lines in the CMS implementation process including such objectives as migration to responsive design, abandonment of outdated content, integration of social media, or improvement of site architecture and usability? An entire set of metrics surrounding the consumption side of the system may be appropriate.

Ultimately, you certainly should review contributor metrics as well, which will be heavily influenced by the culture of the organization. Those include such characteristics as the autonomy of contributors, their comfort level with web editing tools, and the organization's business model and resultant workflows. Ultimately, you'll be able to measure the success from the contribution side by how active your users are on the new system, their comfort level with it, and the consistency of the subsequent content based on the design, style, and workflow parameters you develop.

RSS

Elsewhere

Latest Activity

Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Tomorrow is the last day to save $100 on your registration for the 2015 OmniUpdate User Training Conference. http://omniupdate.com/outc ; "
yesterday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"So proud of our implementations, training, and support teams for all their hard work and dedication!  Roll Out the Red Carpet: It’s Awards Season "
yesterday
Natalie Semmler joined Mark Greenfield's group
Thumbnail

Accessibility

This group is for all those interested in Web Accessibility.See More
Wednesday
Natalie Semmler joined Sveta's group
Thumbnail

CMS

Content Management System
Wednesday
Natalie Semmler joined Brian Panulla's group
Thumbnail

ColdFusion

Group for those using Adobe ColdFusion in a higher education context.
Wednesday
Natalie Semmler joined Cal Anderson's group
Thumbnail

Terminal Four Site Manager

For institutions using Terminal Four's (T4) Site Manager CMS.See More
Wednesday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Congratulations to Pepperdine University! They went live with 7 responsive websites, including a social hub (socialhub.pepperdine.edu/) which uses OU Mashup. Check it out: pepperdine.edu "
Wednesday
Michelle L. Monti posted a discussion

Questioning the Value of College Holiday Videos

I'm wondering what people think is the value of doing a holiday video for a college/university. What is the goal? Do schools make them simply because others are doing it? Who is the target audience - is it to maintain engagement with alums or to attract prospectives and their families? When do schools start planning them - (in September/October?) What do people see as a return on this investment of so much time?I'm asking because I have worked at one school where we made a holiday video…See More
Wednesday
Michelle L. Monti is now a member of University Web Developers
Wednesday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Don't miss out on this great opportunity. Participate in Real Story Group's Web Content Management Survey and get a summary of the results. "
Tuesday
Sara Clark posted a discussion

Missouri State University seeks videographer/editor

Missouri State University is accepting applications for a videographer/editor for marketing and communications.Position comes with superior benefits, including group health insurance, life insurance, retirement, tuition waivers, wellness programs and professional development opportunities. Learn more about benefits.ResponsibilitiesOrganizes, records and…See More
Monday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Have you heard? OmniUpdate has a Pinterest Page! We created the page to showcase our customers' awesome web pages and projects for inspiration and motivation. Learn more on our blog. "
Jan 23
Andrew Collington is now a member of University Web Developers
Jan 21
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Lance Merker, President and CEO of OmniUpdate, reflects on our 2014 accomplishments. Read it now on the blog! "
Jan 20
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"OU Campus users, have you signed up for this month's Training Tuesday? Don't miss out. Join us Tuesday, January. 27th, 2015 at 11:00 am PT and learn how to integrate social media channels together with OU Mashup!"
Jan 19
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
" If you’ve performed a search on omniupdate.com recently, you probably found our new and improved search solution! Find out why it's better on our blog. "
Jan 15
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Joining the OU Campus user community is Jackson State Community College. WELCOME!"
Jan 13
Alisa Harrison joined Lynn Zawie's group
Thumbnail

OmniUpdate

Share your experiences using OmniUpdate CMS
Jan 12
Alisa Harrison is now a member of University Web Developers
Jan 12
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Voltaire Santos Miran, Co-founder and CEO of mStoner, speaks to Lance Merker, OmniUpdate’s President and CEO, about changes in the higher education industry. Check it out!"
Jan 9

UWEBD has been in existence for more than 10 years and is the very best email discussion list on the Internet, in any industry, on any topic

About

© 2015   Created by Mark Greenfield.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service