University Web Developers

University Web Developers

We are in the initial stages of project planning for a web CMS implementation in FY2014.  As we begin to develop our project planning documentation, we are somewhat struggling to come up with meaningful, measurable metrics for determining success of our project.  So far, we are considering measuring: 1) the percentage of trained content managers that are "actively" using the system once implemented, and 2) the percentage of trained content managers who are "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the usability and functionality of the CMS, based on their responses to an online survey.

Can anyone else share some metrics they have used to measure the success of a CMS implementation?

Thanks for your help~

Chris

Tags: CMS, management, metrics, project

Views: 541

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Chris,

I have some questions to consider when determining the best way to measure success of a new cms. I'll send you an email that may help.

Annette

Thanks, Annette!

Hi Annette -- any chance you could share a version of your questions here? It might be very helpful to those of us contemplating CMS changes and upgrades. Thanks!

Hi Daniel,

The measurement of success is based on the reason for the change of CMS in the first place. Is the CMS upgrade part of an overall redesign and updated information architecture? Or is it a stand alone project? Are you moving from having no CMS into one? Are you moving from one certain CMS to another due to contributor difficulties, development standstill or poor service?

Basically, it depends on what you are looking to measure and what your definition of success is being based on.  Also, you can compare the site/page updates before and after CMS implementation.

We get hired as a consultant many times to help zero in on all the pain points within and organization, analyze data, conduct user ability audits, and consolidate a schools goals which we then recommend a CMS that is best suited for their needs.   Since we have an extensive history of experience in higher ed our insight and contribution is quite valuable. It allows for our clients various departments to be heard and considered before making such a major decision.

Hope that helps! 

As Annette said, it depends on why you're doing it. What are the problems that need to be solved, and what are the outcomes that can be measured? I'm planning to switch to a CMS from not having one this coming year, and most of our issues are around quality control. I'll be looking at things like broken links, misspellings, web writing quality and internal standards compliance, information accuracy, etc., as well as bottom line metrics like conversions.

We are also transforming our web this year with new visual design system and CMS.  We should definitely all collaborate on drivers, best-practice, planning, and execution.

Our program has three high level objectives:

  • Provide an unparalleled authoring and publishing experience
    • Give author more powerful and easier to use tools
    • Remove IT from all publishing tasks
    • Remove on technology knowledge requirement from the authoring process
    • Measures: volume of new content and updated content, IT ticket rates, 
  • Deliver leading edge user experiences
    • Improve "findability" of content
    • Improve UX tailored to persona type
    • Be exceptional across multidevices
    • Measure: visitors, pageview, time on page, bounce rates, mobility satisfaction,content reuse,etc
  • Build a strong web builder community
    • Train users on UX, usability, content strategy, etc
    • Audit and support better content and UX
    • Measures: active users, training volume, self-support rates, seminar attendance,

I've done both. With positive results. And you can adjust according to feedback. 

How are you defining "actively using" the system? 

What constitutes a  "trained" content manager? And of course, what determines "satisfaction?"

Have you thought about it from an output perspective? How many web pages effectively published/maintained? 

Thanks to all for your responses.  

George-

"Actively using" the system means: that content manager's pages are being maintained/updated (evidenced by no outdated content) and they aren't coming to IT for those updates.

A "trained" content manager means they've gone through whatever training we and/or the vendor has provided them and they are "actively using" the system as defined above.

"Satisfaction" is measured via a post-implementation online survey of the content managers.  The question(s) will provide a 5 point range of responses, from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied".

We hadn't necessarily thought about it from an output perspective, not knowing a good way to measure/quantify that.  I struggle with the true worth or value of an absolute number like "web pages effectively published/maintained".  Couldn't you have a high number for that and still have users really unsatisfied with the process/system for getting their pages updated?

The amount of post-training assistance hours that are needed with content managers may be a helpful metric to track as well. You can (perhaps) learn something about both user "activity" and success of the training component.

Number of page revisions and length of days in approval processes may be good metrics to look at quarter over quarter, or whatever interval makes sense for you- In other words, as we progress, did we see the former increase and the latter decrease? etc.  I think those might help you make statements about the relevance and up-to-date-ness of your content.

What are the overall goals of the project, aside from implementation. Why bring a new CMS on board ? Was it to make content upkeep more effective? To address back end issues? Look to tie metrics to those higher goals as well.

While it's generally not the primary justification for implementing a new web CMS, it's almost inevitable that doing so will lead to changes in your consumer-facing web design regardless of what your current site architecture may be. That being that case, it's also helpful to include that perspective in your project objectives. What can you achieve along those lines in the CMS implementation process including such objectives as migration to responsive design, abandonment of outdated content, integration of social media, or improvement of site architecture and usability? An entire set of metrics surrounding the consumption side of the system may be appropriate.

Ultimately, you certainly should review contributor metrics as well, which will be heavily influenced by the culture of the organization. Those include such characteristics as the autonomy of contributors, their comfort level with web editing tools, and the organization's business model and resultant workflows. Ultimately, you'll be able to measure the success from the contribution side by how active your users are on the new system, their comfort level with it, and the consistency of the subsequent content based on the design, style, and workflow parameters you develop.

RSS

Elsewhere

Latest Activity

Michael Nielsen shared their discussion on Facebook
2 hours ago
Michael Nielsen posted a discussion

Technical Specialist

There is a position opening in our office that would help support the entire Division of Student Affairs. Please forward to anyone who may be interested or might know someone who is interested. It is an entry level position. Primary focus is on systems management, web application development and some website design. Technical Specialisthttp://www.lasalle.edu/financeadmin/hresources/jobs.php?id=509See More
2 hours ago
Profile IconMichael Nielsen, Blaine Herman, Sarah Golden and 1 more joined University Web Developers
2 hours ago
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Congratulations to University of the Incarnate Word for their new website and social media hub!"
20 hours ago
Anne Vaassen joined Mark Greenfield's group
Thumbnail

WordPress

This group is for all those using WordPress as both a blogging platform and as a CMS
yesterday
Profile IconDerik Casper, John Gardner and Ryan Richter joined University Web Developers
yesterday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
" It’s the last day to submit your gadget ideas! One idea = a free T-Shirt, but more submissions = more chances to win free OUTC15 registration!"
Tuesday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Calling all presenters! It's time to submit for OUTC15. Learn more on our blog. "
Monday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Hey, OU Campus developers and site administrators! Don’t miss out on this month’s Training Tuesday on Sept. 30th at 11 AM PST, featuring how to create your own gadgets. Register now! "
Friday
Sara Clark posted a discussion

Oct. 18-19: Web conference for college students in Portland, Ore.

I’m writing to let you know of an awesome opportunity for any of your current students who have an interest in a web-related field, whether it’s on the technical side or content-creation side (or both!): CrowdSource Summit: A Conference for Emerging Web Professionals.This conference is presented by the Higher Education Web Professionals Association, known more affectionately as HighEdWeb. I’m a member, and I attend its Annual…See More
Friday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"  Have you ever looked up your institution’s walk score? Learn why you should share that information in today’s blog post! "
Sep 25
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Only one week left to nominate OU Campus for a Critic’s Choice CMS award AND University Business Readers’ Choice Top Products award. Thank you for your support!"
Sep 24
Profile IconCesar De La Garza and Timothy Hew joined University Web Developers
Sep 24
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Help build up the next generation of web pros by sending your students to High Ed Web's CrowdSource Summit. "
Sep 23
John Jackson posted a discussion

Web developer

The Web Communications team at Virginia Tech seeks a web designer/developer. This is an exciting time to join our team. We are migrating to a new content management system and expect this person to assist in the effort to develop templates, implement designs, and help us determine how the visual standards will evolve for new devices. Going forward, the successful candidate will work to develop new layouts for the web, mobile devices, and apps. Full job description with a  link to the…See More
Sep 23
C.S. Sherman posted discussions
Sep 23
Jenn Baker posted a discussion

University of Alaska Fairbanks Digital Communications Manager

The Digital Communications Manager is a key member of the leadership team of the Marketing and Communications office. Reporting to the director of Marketing and Communications and working with highly motivated colleagues, the manager will oversee a cohesive, leading-edge digital communications strategy that advances the university's national and global impact and image. The manager will oversee staff responsible for the UAF website, social media, and videography. The Digital Communications…See More
Sep 22
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Another responsive site! Way to go Clarion University of Pennsylvania. Looks fantastic! www.clarion.edu"
Sep 22
Profile IconJenn Baker and Jose Vidal joined University Web Developers
Sep 20
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Loving all the gadget ideas! Have you submitted yours? http://omniupdate.com/campaigns/gadget-challenge/2014/"
Sep 19

UWEBD has been in existence for more than 10 years and is the very best email discussion list on the Internet, in any industry, on any topic

About

© 2014   Created by Mark Greenfield.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service