University Web Developers

University Web Developers

We are in the initial stages of project planning for a web CMS implementation in FY2014.  As we begin to develop our project planning documentation, we are somewhat struggling to come up with meaningful, measurable metrics for determining success of our project.  So far, we are considering measuring: 1) the percentage of trained content managers that are "actively" using the system once implemented, and 2) the percentage of trained content managers who are "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the usability and functionality of the CMS, based on their responses to an online survey.

Can anyone else share some metrics they have used to measure the success of a CMS implementation?

Thanks for your help~

Chris

Views: 1042

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Chris,

I have some questions to consider when determining the best way to measure success of a new cms. I'll send you an email that may help.

Annette

Thanks, Annette!

Hi Annette -- any chance you could share a version of your questions here? It might be very helpful to those of us contemplating CMS changes and upgrades. Thanks!

Hi Daniel,

The measurement of success is based on the reason for the change of CMS in the first place. Is the CMS upgrade part of an overall redesign and updated information architecture? Or is it a stand alone project? Are you moving from having no CMS into one? Are you moving from one certain CMS to another due to contributor difficulties, development standstill or poor service?

Basically, it depends on what you are looking to measure and what your definition of success is being based on.  Also, you can compare the site/page updates before and after CMS implementation.

We get hired as a consultant many times to help zero in on all the pain points within and organization, analyze data, conduct user ability audits, and consolidate a schools goals which we then recommend a CMS that is best suited for their needs.   Since we have an extensive history of experience in higher ed our insight and contribution is quite valuable. It allows for our clients various departments to be heard and considered before making such a major decision.

Hope that helps! 

As Annette said, it depends on why you're doing it. What are the problems that need to be solved, and what are the outcomes that can be measured? I'm planning to switch to a CMS from not having one this coming year, and most of our issues are around quality control. I'll be looking at things like broken links, misspellings, web writing quality and internal standards compliance, information accuracy, etc., as well as bottom line metrics like conversions.

Thanks to all for your responses.  

George-

"Actively using" the system means: that content manager's pages are being maintained/updated (evidenced by no outdated content) and they aren't coming to IT for those updates.

A "trained" content manager means they've gone through whatever training we and/or the vendor has provided them and they are "actively using" the system as defined above.

"Satisfaction" is measured via a post-implementation online survey of the content managers.  The question(s) will provide a 5 point range of responses, from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied".

We hadn't necessarily thought about it from an output perspective, not knowing a good way to measure/quantify that.  I struggle with the true worth or value of an absolute number like "web pages effectively published/maintained".  Couldn't you have a high number for that and still have users really unsatisfied with the process/system for getting their pages updated?

The amount of post-training assistance hours that are needed with content managers may be a helpful metric to track as well. You can (perhaps) learn something about both user "activity" and success of the training component.

Number of page revisions and length of days in approval processes may be good metrics to look at quarter over quarter, or whatever interval makes sense for you- In other words, as we progress, did we see the former increase and the latter decrease? etc.  I think those might help you make statements about the relevance and up-to-date-ness of your content.

What are the overall goals of the project, aside from implementation. Why bring a new CMS on board ? Was it to make content upkeep more effective? To address back end issues? Look to tie metrics to those higher goals as well.

While it's generally not the primary justification for implementing a new web CMS, it's almost inevitable that doing so will lead to changes in your consumer-facing web design regardless of what your current site architecture may be. That being that case, it's also helpful to include that perspective in your project objectives. What can you achieve along those lines in the CMS implementation process including such objectives as migration to responsive design, abandonment of outdated content, integration of social media, or improvement of site architecture and usability? An entire set of metrics surrounding the consumption side of the system may be appropriate.

Ultimately, you certainly should review contributor metrics as well, which will be heavily influenced by the culture of the organization. Those include such characteristics as the autonomy of contributors, their comfort level with web editing tools, and the organization's business model and resultant workflows. Ultimately, you'll be able to measure the success from the contribution side by how active your users are on the new system, their comfort level with it, and the consistency of the subsequent content based on the design, style, and workflow parameters you develop.

RSS

Elsewhere

Latest Activity

Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"With graduation 2018 in (or almost in) the books, it’s time to turn your attention to all the projects you didn’t get around to the last year. "
16 hours ago
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Join Josh from VisionPoint on our next webcast to learn SEO basics and how to position your content in the best way possible. Register today! "
Wednesday
Holly LaRose-Roenicke posted a discussion

Looking for inexpensive job intake/ work request tools. Anything Office 365?

We are part of University Communications and are looking for a tool or product to take in job requests, project requests, etc. Would prefer something that allows a feedback survey that asks for client satisfaction upon job completion. What are you using? What do you like about it?See More
May 18
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Does your school have international students? Have you received website inquiries from prospective students living overseas? Do any of your alumni and donors live abroad? "
May 15
Katie Ryan-Lambert joined Mark Greenfield's group
May 14
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"With the release of OU Campus version 10.8, Snippets are even better! "
May 11
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"What do higher ed mission statements and refrigerator magnet poetry have in common? "
May 10
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Your site shouldn't be a refrigerator door showcasing your accomplishments. In our next webcast, learn how to request and create better content to meet your site goals! Register today"
May 9
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Drupal has once again made news with two vulnerabilities that make cyberattacks easy. Is your CMS safe? "
May 8
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"If your website, and specifically the content you’re showcasing, isn’t serving your marketing goals, you’re missing opportunities. #CMS #highered "
May 4
Katie Ryan-Lambert joined Anthony's group
Thumbnail

Plone

Discussion about Plone CMS.
May 2
Katie Ryan-Lambert is now a member of University Web Developers
May 1
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Accessibility should be a deciding factor when choosing a web content management system. If a CMS purchase is in your future, consider these factors. "
Apr 30
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"The more you plan and anticipate issues upfront, the smoother your migration from a homegrown CMS to OU Campus will be. "
Apr 26
Profile IconKeith Castillo and Kimberly Prieto joined University Web Developers
Apr 25
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Ever wonder what other colleges and universities are doing to attract prospective students and keep faculty, staff, and existing students informed? Get some inspiration from these award winners"
Apr 23
Profile IconBrian Piper, Kim Brown and Marianne Schneider joined University Web Developers
Apr 23
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Now available in our OU Campus CMS, Global Search doesn’t require knowledge of navigating your website’s structure. It only requires general knowledge of the content or item you want to find. "
Apr 20
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"For months, you’ve reviewed templates and created, deleted, and revised content for your new redesigned website. Now it’s time to move the content. "
Apr 19
Rachel Burt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Join Caroline Roberts from iFactory for our next webcast on how to audit your content for a new CMS launch. Register today! "
Apr 19

UWEBD has been in existence for more than 10 years and is the very best email discussion list on the Internet, in any industry, on any topic

About

© 2018   Created by Mark Greenfield.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service