University Web Developers

University Web Developers

We are in the initial stages of project planning for a web CMS implementation in FY2014.  As we begin to develop our project planning documentation, we are somewhat struggling to come up with meaningful, measurable metrics for determining success of our project.  So far, we are considering measuring: 1) the percentage of trained content managers that are "actively" using the system once implemented, and 2) the percentage of trained content managers who are "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the usability and functionality of the CMS, based on their responses to an online survey.

Can anyone else share some metrics they have used to measure the success of a CMS implementation?

Thanks for your help~

Chris

Tags: CMS, management, metrics, project

Views: 566

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Chris,

I have some questions to consider when determining the best way to measure success of a new cms. I'll send you an email that may help.

Annette

Thanks, Annette!

Hi Annette -- any chance you could share a version of your questions here? It might be very helpful to those of us contemplating CMS changes and upgrades. Thanks!

Hi Daniel,

The measurement of success is based on the reason for the change of CMS in the first place. Is the CMS upgrade part of an overall redesign and updated information architecture? Or is it a stand alone project? Are you moving from having no CMS into one? Are you moving from one certain CMS to another due to contributor difficulties, development standstill or poor service?

Basically, it depends on what you are looking to measure and what your definition of success is being based on.  Also, you can compare the site/page updates before and after CMS implementation.

We get hired as a consultant many times to help zero in on all the pain points within and organization, analyze data, conduct user ability audits, and consolidate a schools goals which we then recommend a CMS that is best suited for their needs.   Since we have an extensive history of experience in higher ed our insight and contribution is quite valuable. It allows for our clients various departments to be heard and considered before making such a major decision.

Hope that helps! 

As Annette said, it depends on why you're doing it. What are the problems that need to be solved, and what are the outcomes that can be measured? I'm planning to switch to a CMS from not having one this coming year, and most of our issues are around quality control. I'll be looking at things like broken links, misspellings, web writing quality and internal standards compliance, information accuracy, etc., as well as bottom line metrics like conversions.

We are also transforming our web this year with new visual design system and CMS.  We should definitely all collaborate on drivers, best-practice, planning, and execution.

Our program has three high level objectives:

  • Provide an unparalleled authoring and publishing experience
    • Give author more powerful and easier to use tools
    • Remove IT from all publishing tasks
    • Remove on technology knowledge requirement from the authoring process
    • Measures: volume of new content and updated content, IT ticket rates, 
  • Deliver leading edge user experiences
    • Improve "findability" of content
    • Improve UX tailored to persona type
    • Be exceptional across multidevices
    • Measure: visitors, pageview, time on page, bounce rates, mobility satisfaction,content reuse,etc
  • Build a strong web builder community
    • Train users on UX, usability, content strategy, etc
    • Audit and support better content and UX
    • Measures: active users, training volume, self-support rates, seminar attendance,

I've done both. With positive results. And you can adjust according to feedback. 

How are you defining "actively using" the system? 

What constitutes a  "trained" content manager? And of course, what determines "satisfaction?"

Have you thought about it from an output perspective? How many web pages effectively published/maintained? 

Thanks to all for your responses.  

George-

"Actively using" the system means: that content manager's pages are being maintained/updated (evidenced by no outdated content) and they aren't coming to IT for those updates.

A "trained" content manager means they've gone through whatever training we and/or the vendor has provided them and they are "actively using" the system as defined above.

"Satisfaction" is measured via a post-implementation online survey of the content managers.  The question(s) will provide a 5 point range of responses, from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied".

We hadn't necessarily thought about it from an output perspective, not knowing a good way to measure/quantify that.  I struggle with the true worth or value of an absolute number like "web pages effectively published/maintained".  Couldn't you have a high number for that and still have users really unsatisfied with the process/system for getting their pages updated?

The amount of post-training assistance hours that are needed with content managers may be a helpful metric to track as well. You can (perhaps) learn something about both user "activity" and success of the training component.

Number of page revisions and length of days in approval processes may be good metrics to look at quarter over quarter, or whatever interval makes sense for you- In other words, as we progress, did we see the former increase and the latter decrease? etc.  I think those might help you make statements about the relevance and up-to-date-ness of your content.

What are the overall goals of the project, aside from implementation. Why bring a new CMS on board ? Was it to make content upkeep more effective? To address back end issues? Look to tie metrics to those higher goals as well.

While it's generally not the primary justification for implementing a new web CMS, it's almost inevitable that doing so will lead to changes in your consumer-facing web design regardless of what your current site architecture may be. That being that case, it's also helpful to include that perspective in your project objectives. What can you achieve along those lines in the CMS implementation process including such objectives as migration to responsive design, abandonment of outdated content, integration of social media, or improvement of site architecture and usability? An entire set of metrics surrounding the consumption side of the system may be appropriate.

Ultimately, you certainly should review contributor metrics as well, which will be heavily influenced by the culture of the organization. Those include such characteristics as the autonomy of contributors, their comfort level with web editing tools, and the organization's business model and resultant workflows. Ultimately, you'll be able to measure the success from the contribution side by how active your users are on the new system, their comfort level with it, and the consistency of the subsequent content based on the design, style, and workflow parameters you develop.

RSS

Elsewhere

Latest Activity

Aparna Shrivastava is now a member of University Web Developers
Monday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Our customer, Eric Li from Wharton County Junior College, shares his experience presenting on WCJC's Faculty Website. Read it now! "
Friday
Pamela Riesmeyer joined Mark Greenfield's group
Thumbnail

Accessibility

This group is for all those interested in Web Accessibility.See More
Friday
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"The OmniUpdate family is happy to welcome Bard College at Simon's Rock! "
Thursday
Tim Yandel is now a member of University Web Developers
Thursday
Mahmud Rahman is now a member of University Web Developers
Nov 18
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Please help us welcome our newest customer, Butler County Community College! Thanks for joining us."
Nov 17
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Are you working to increase your institution’s ranking in search results? Read today's blog post to learn how!"
Nov 12
Ronna Johnston posted a status
"Is anyone willing to share their RFP for a Content Management System? We are pursuing a university -wide tool. Thanks in advance."
Nov 12
Jonathan Thompson posted a discussion

Front End Developer--Johns Hopkins University

The Front End Developer is part of a team that provides development, analysis of websites, web-based applications, and web-based services in support of the work of the Johns Hopkins University Office of Communications and reports to the Director of Digital Strategy.The primary duties and responsibilities of the job include:Works at high programming and creative level, demonstrating proficiency in interpreting graphic visual or interaction designs using modern web standards and technologies…See More
Nov 11
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"There’s still time to submit your Topic Table proposal for OUTC15. For more information or to submit, visit our Call for Proposals page. Don't miss your chance to receive ½ off registration.The deadline for submissions is…"
Nov 10
Jonathan Thompson is now a member of University Web Developers
Nov 10
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Have you seen The University of South Alabama’s awesome News System? It’s responsive! southalabama.edu/news"
Nov 7
richard ota joined Mark Greenfield's group
Thumbnail

WordPress

This group is for all those using WordPress as both a blogging platform and as a CMS
Nov 6
richard ota joined DNI's group
Thumbnail

Cascade Server CMS

For folks who use (or are interested in) Hannon Hill's Cascade Server CMS productSee More
Nov 6
richard ota joined Lynn Zawie's group
Thumbnail

OmniUpdate

Share your experiences using OmniUpdate CMS
Nov 6
richard ota joined Arlen Johnson's group
Thumbnail

Calendars

Discuss event calendars and calendaring - identify products, solutions, and needs
Nov 6
Kari Johnston is now a member of University Web Developers
Nov 6
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Congratulations to UC Irvine School of Social Sciences for going live with their new responsive website! www.socsci.uci.edu"
Nov 6
Erin Leavitt commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Learn the real difference between on-premise and cloud-based software solutions in today’s blog post! "
Nov 5

UWEBD has been in existence for more than 10 years and is the very best email discussion list on the Internet, in any industry, on any topic

About

© 2014   Created by Mark Greenfield.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service