University Web Developers

University Web Developers

So here's my situation- we've got over 230 web editors campus-wide who handle the day-to-day upkeep and maintenance of content on their sites. Basic stuff like spelling corrections, news/announcement postings, inserting new graphics etc. Some are fantastic. Some use the system rarely, and tend to need some coaching everytime the dive back in. And a minute handful just aren't getting it. We hold several monthly training sessions, and often hold one-on-one sessions for those folks who need a little extra hand-holding. Absolutely happy to do it- if they show that they want to make an effort to learn, we're happy to show them the way!

So my teams issue is, we've got a handful of web editors (well, at the moment, really just one) who just aren't getting it. This one in particular, really nice person, the training is just not sinking in. She's attended multiple group workshops, we've conducted literally DAYS (over the course of the year) of one-on-one time with her, and she's still not grasping basic web editing. She continues to edit her pages and muck things up with every edit/publish.

My question is- do any of you folks have policy covering incompetent web editors? Removing these individuals access to a site? Can you post/send me a link to anything you might have online or forward me any documents you might have?We're a brand new shop (just over a year now at this point) and are still in the process of encountering governance issues like this and I need something as a starting point to work something up, so that we can get someone to replace her. I can't spend any more of our limited time with this person, continually reteaching and correcting her mistakes.

Help?

Thank you in advance,

-Dan

Dan Demmons

Director of Web Services
Providence College

ddemmons@providence.edu

Views: 420

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I would love to see policy examples, too, because I'm in the same boat.

I've run into this with a few people in the past. I ended up telling them to just submit their change requests to us through our Zendesk account, and we take care of it. I then removed their CMS access. They were okay with it because it meant less work for them.

As we move to a new CMS, I'm taking the opportunity to revamp our policies and training programs. No longer are we going to grant CMS access to anyone who wants it. They will have to go through our training program first, and we will assess their competency. If they just aren't tech savvy, I will likely make a recommendation to their supervisor or the owner of the website on who should be an editor.

Hopefully that will move most departments away from assigning these tasks to their admin assistants as just another miscellaneous responsibility. "Web editor" roles should be formally added to job descriptions and require certain skill sets.

Bottom line, I guess, is that you just have to be proactive and say look, this isn't working, can someone else in your dept take this on? But I'm not sure how to generalize that into policy language.

Dan,

As you know, this issue falls into the realm of web governance. All roles and responsibilities need to be clearly articulated, and everyone needs to be held accountable. Have you talked to the supervisor of the web editor in question?  Are the editorial responsibilities in their job description?  Do their annual performance evaluations include how well they are editing the web? (And in a perfect world you would be part of the evaluation process.)

Ping me if you want to discuss further.

Dan,

I'm the content manager and strategist at Eastern Mennonite University in Virginia. We're a small private university - www.emu.edu - with about 75 web editors on campus. Occasionally, we encounter editors who, even after a lengthy period of training, simply aren't a good fit for web work. (We offer beginner and intermediate training twice per year, during our campus-wide faculty/staff development, and we also offer 1:1 training for those who need a bit of hand-holding, as you say above)

When we encounter a staff member who just isn't a good fit, I usually have a 1:1 conversation with that person and his or her supervisor or department chair and encourage him or her to review information online regularly but pass the work to us in the marketing office. Often, these editors are an excellent resource for reviewing online info and keeping it current, but the technical and/or creative aspect of web work "just isn't there." I don't maintain a written policy on this, but after a number of years in this role - and since we are a smaller institution - I have a good idea of those for whom web work is a natural fit.

And thanks to our marketing director's work over the years, faculty and program directors are also now considering the importance of web work in the hiring process, and experience in the field or a natural affinity is a big plus for communications or coordinator positions.

We also have a standard content design and when editors step outside of the standard a number of times I will schedule a meeting with that editor and see if there's a better fit. Again, it comes down to 1:1 conversation at our university.

http://www.emu.edu/marketing/standards-and-guides/web-publishing/st...

The way that I've handled this type of issue is to have all publishing go through an approval workflow.  (Short answer - no one can publish to the live site - they can only edit and submit changes for 'approval').


Most 'approvals' only take about 30 seconds - a quick spell check - link check - accessibility check - and publish.


It DOES create a bit of a bottleneck at times, but the time spent dealing with the workflow publishing approvals is far less than the alternative (fixing someone's messed up site/pages after they've gone live to the site).

We use OU Campus from OmniUpdate, and that workflow is built-in to the product.  A life saver, to say the least - we're in our 7th year using their product.


However, most (if not all) WCMS products have some form of workflow/approval process, and I would recommend placing this particular user in that flow immediately, until you can work out some other option for her (and your team).

How many change requests do you get a day on average, and how many people on the web team are assigned to review and publish the changes?

Owners of our departmental sites are the departments themselves - therefore the person ultimately responsible for what's on a department web site is the department chair. The department chair appoints the web editor, and I work with that person to make sure s/he gets at least basic CMS training and I provide technical support as questions arise. I also monitor sites and work with editors to correct issues. 

When I run into an editor that does not (or cannot) fulfill their web duties, I document the failures, report to my supervisor, who has a chat with the department chair. Most of the time, the chair will reappoint their editor.

Unfortunately, sometimes we're still stuck with the incompetent editor. If so, I continue to offer technical support. I'll walk him/her through image uploading for the 50th time - on the phone or in person. I'll continue to document site issues and report them to both the editor and chair. If there's something that *must* be changed, sometimes I will go in and fix it (with the chair and the editor's knowledge and approval), sometimes I'll stand over the editor and guide them through the process. 

But I will not take over maintenance of the site. It is important that the department continue to have ownership and responsibility for all content on their site, and they will not have that if we take over the day-to-day work. 

I feel really sorry for the editors who really aren't cut out for the work - most of the time, they know they're failing, and no one likes that. 

RSS

Elsewhere

Latest Activity

Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Are online forms more efficient? Learn how El Camino College used Formstack to create online forms that expedited processing, improved communications, increased transparency, and promoted accountability across campus. http://bit.ly/2zhdcIt"
yesterday
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"It's important to understand the science behind your web pages to better engage and ultimately attract prospective students to your site. http://bit.ly/2ZYK8FZ"
Sep 12
Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"If you’re struggling with web challenges such as accessibility, SEO, design consistency, workflow, content governance, or how to start a website redesign, you’re not alone. Join our next webcast to learn how other higher ed institutions…"
Sep 5
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"eQAfy confirms that OU Campus is still the #1 commercial CMS for colleges and universities in the United States. http://bit.ly/2Lir9Mn"
Aug 28
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Here’s an outline of everything you need to know about OCR compliance, including what it is, what your college or university can do to stay compliant, and resources for OCR compliance. #accessibility http://bit.ly/2rcPDgG"
Aug 23
Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Join us for our next webcast with April Buscher from Montana State University Billings to learn how blind readers and people with hearing impairment view and read your website and how you can make it accessible to them. http://bit.ly/2zhdcIt"
Aug 14
Amanda Lawson joined Lynn Zawie's group
Thumbnail

OmniUpdate

Share your experiences using OmniUpdate CMS
Aug 9
Amanda Lawson posted a photo

Amanda Lawson

Amanda Lawson, Web Content ManagerCommunity College of Allgheny County
Aug 9
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"High schoolers spend more time on their digital devices than they do sleeping, doing homework, or participating in extracurricular activities. So how do you make your message stand out to them? #eexpect http://bit.ly/2MOIIWC"
Aug 8
Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Want to increase digital engagement with high school juniors and seniors? Join our next webcast with Stephanie Geyer from Ruffalo Noel Levitz as she shares new data from the 2019 E-Expectations Trend Report on email, paid media, and social media…"
Jul 31
Charlie Holder joined DNI's group
Thumbnail

Cascade Server CMS

For folks who use (or are interested in) Hannon Hill's Cascade Server CMS productSee More
Jul 26
Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Is your website in compliance with the new WCAG 2.1? Join our webcast to learn various accessibility guidelines, what’s new in 2.1, and more! http://bit.ly/2zhdcIt"
Jul 22
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Even though GDPR has been in effect for over a year, many U.S. colleges and universities are still struggling with how best to implement the rules. We’re here to help. http://bit.ly/2YZZtRQ"
Jul 18
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Does your college or university website meet the new WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards? http://bit.ly/2JBXD3s"
Jul 12
Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Join us for our next webcast with Eric Turner from Mt. San Antonio College, who will share easy steps to make your website GDPR compliant. http://bit.ly/2zhdcIt"
Jul 10
Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"It is always important to make a good first impression! Join Aaron Blau from Converge Consulting as he covers ways to make your web content attractive to your target audience and create an authentic brand message. http://bit.ly/2zhdcIt"
Jun 19
Jon Shaw posted a discussion

email obfuscation

Anyone using a javascript or php email obfuscation library that is effective for spam defense?See More
Jun 11
Linda Faciana commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Join us for our next webcast with Kelly Bostick from University of Arkansas who will provide some great tips on ways to ensure that all of your digital content is accessible. http://bit.ly/2zhdcIt"
Jun 6
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Creating and producing website content is just the tip of the iceberg. In our latest white paper, learn how to manage that content to help your website reach its fullest marketing and recruiting potential. http://bit.ly/30WJ0PW"
May 30
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"A college or university website redesign is the most effective and cost-efficient way to attract and recruit new students. Download our ultimate guide to get started on your redesign today! http://bit.ly/30MmcSQ"
May 28

UWEBD has been in existence for more than 10 years and is the very best email discussion list on the Internet, in any industry, on any topic

About

© 2019   Created by Mark Greenfield.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service