University Web Developers

University Web Developers

So, I had a random thought tonight I'm going to try to execute on - assuming I can mitigate The Authority's panic response to the potential "risks." I want to try having a town hall type meeting on campus with faculty, staff, students, and community to have an open talk about our website. No restrictions: website, student portal, other tools, needs, failures, successes, etc. 

 

Has anyone else done something like this? I feel like it'd be a great way especially to get faculty to realize just how much more important the web is outside of their bubbles when they hear folks talking about all the other stuff they want to be able to do. Analytics and surveys only go so far, and I've always been one to say that the best way to find things out is to get up out of the office and go ask them.

Views: 223

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Brilliant idea. I'm imagining this in my head, and to have administration and faculty there while students speak their mind could be really eye opening and put a spotlight on what it takes to meet their expectations. Could start some big conversations.

I can't think of a valid argument against it. Of course some may not want to open a can of worms because it would create more work for them, but I think that's the equivalent of sticking fingers in your ears and saying "la la la".

Getting real feedback is crucial. I didn't know what I was missing until I started using things like 4Q and Kampyle.

How do you imagine setting up the event? Big auditorium with a projector/screen and mics for the audience? A large computer lab would be great, or somehow allowing people to have the site in front of them while talking about it...

I'm thinking like an auditorium or big room in the student union. Screen with the site to go through things. A moderator (either myself or my boss), and a panel of ~6 people to represent some of the various parts of our web presence: IT (student portal), athletics, alumni, library, Mar/Comm, ed support (LMS). Then, just basically open mic it, with the moderator leading through some general categories (maybe grouping comments by components of the site, or by concepts).

Generally, I find any time you open yourself up to criticism, administration gets very nervous. Personally, I'm fine with it, because I pretty much know the problems to begin with, so it won't be a surprise for me (and really, should reinforce a lot of what I'm already saying we should focus on). I think going the panel route, it would be important to prep the other members, as they either might not be as knowledgeable about the underpinnings, or be ready for some of the possible critiques they'll get.

I think one of the interesting values here is getting discrete audiences together. We always talk about all the audiences we serve, and we tend to approach that by grouping/surveying them separately, but the reality is there are no defined lines when it comes to the site itself. These folks all go all over. Could yield really interesting usability solutions to different parts of the site.

The idea is great, and I agree w/ you critizism is fine as long as it's kept constructive.   I can see two points of failure, each of which is manageable.   

 

1) If you want administration to 'have an awaking" about the significance of the website, you need to make sure they (Admin) is properly represented at the meeting, or you have a way of disseminating the information from the meeting in a way that they will review the findings.

 

2) What are the action items from the meeting?  Who is going to decide which ideas deserve some further investigation. There will be some tangential comments, and I find people have a tendency to get nervous because they think there has to be taken on all suggestions from a open discussion.  Once you've defined which ones to move forward w/, define the sponsor and make it happen.    

 

I'm quite interested in hearing about your results.  We're in the middle of a site redesign and depending on how that goes for you I may look at something similar for our version two.   

 

 

Honestly, I see this as being much more for my benefit, than administration's. Folks pretty much understand the importance of the web here at this point. I just feel that we run too often on assumptions about user needs, so I want to make sure I'm aligning my efforts with what audiences are actually feeling.

As for action items, I think you go in with a list of talking points prepared. High level stuff mostly. Then just have the moderator lead discussion as it makes sense. A good moderator should be able to do this anyway, and if you don't discourage particular threads and tangents, you could uncover very interesting things.

Instead of a town hall (they tend not to be well attended at our school), we held a series of informal chats about the website.  We broke the first series of them down by students, faculty, and staff.  We got a lot of valuable insight on many elements of our website.  As expected, some groups had the completely opposite opinion from the other.  The plan is to turn this into kind of a website user's group, with quarterly discussions about the website.

Dee, this is a good idea.  We are also in the middle of a re-design and we have formed a web advisory group from the different units within the School. Each unit is represented and they will "test" the designs in the development environment. We are carefully planning and prototyping interactions as well as implementing a whole new content strategy so the content does not become stagnant (big issue for us).  Our approach is agile as we use the dev environment for the iterations. 

 

The web advisory board is not a decision committee, so it won’t slow down the redesign process when in disagreement of what works and what doesn’t.  I am not taking leaps of faith when it comes to user needs; I need concrete user research and testing to demystify the assumptions that administration has about the users.    The first interviews gave us a good “base” for the new design, and now it is onto the real testing and see if what we came up with would be effective with our audience groups.  In part, I think that this approach allows us to better collaborate and come together with the vision we have for the new site, but we would also have the user test data to justify our design decisions.

RSS

Elsewhere

Latest Activity

Sara Kisseberth posted a discussion

Archived magazine stories

Greetings,What are you all doing online with "old" magazine stories? Do you delete issues after so  many years? 5 years? 10? I'm torn between keeping all on for historical purposes or keeping just a few years online to simplify the site (ala Gerry McGovern.) Curious as to what you see best practices being.ThanksSara KisseberthBluffton Universitywww.bluffton.eduSee More
Jun 10
Erin Jorgensen posted a discussion

HighEdWeb 2020 Accessibility Summit

The HighEdWeb 2020 Accessibility Summit is a one-day, online conference about digital accessibility in higher education happening June 25, 2020, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. CDT.Join in to learn best practices, share stories and connect with your higher ed peers on topics including social media accessibility, web development, user experience and more. Sessions are designed to boost knowledge at every level, from accessibility beginners to technical experts. Conference registration is $25, with…See More
May 29
Erin Jorgensen is now a member of University Web Developers
May 29
Christine Boehler posted a discussion

HighEdWeb 2020 Annual Conference - ONLINE

October 19-20, 2020https://2020.highedweb.org/#HEWeb20     Join us ONLINE for HighEdWeb 2020, the conference created by and for higher education professionals across all departments and divisions. Together we explore and find solutions for the unique issues facing digital teams at colleges and universities. In 2020, the Conference will be held completely online, offering multiple tracks of streamed presentations, live…See More
May 3
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Throughout April, we're hosting webcasts exploring how colleges and universities across North America are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Register for the series today! https://bit.ly/2xsXhK9"
Apr 13
Christelle Lachapelle is now a member of University Web Developers
Apr 6
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Download our latest white paper to learn how the demographics of today’s higher ed learners are shifting, and how schools can adapt to meet the needs of these new learners. https://bit.ly/2wTKdgB"
Mar 31
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Join our next webcast with Amrit Ahluwalia from The EvoLLLution to learn about the new "modern learner" in higher education. https://bit.ly/2UuDh2I"
Mar 30
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"As we ride out the latest developments and impact of the coronavirus, there's no better time than now to learn the three Bs of crisis planning. http://bit.ly/2ITVkc2"
Mar 16
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Is your college or university prepared to meet the challenges that come with disasters and emergencies like the coronavirus? Learn how your CMS can help. http://bit.ly/2TUZUM8"
Mar 12
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"Can’t afford the time and money to launch a comprehensive guided pathways model? Register for our FREE webcast to learn tricks for simulating a digital guided pathways experience."
Feb 21
Sara Arnold commented on Lynn Zawie's group OmniUpdate
"With college enrollment decreasing for the 8th year in a row, boosting your college or university marketing efforts is more important than ever. Here's how to get started. http://bit.ly/2vTQAzz"
Feb 20
Christine Boehler posted a discussion

HighEdWeb 2020 Annual Conference

October 18-21, 2020 in Little Rock, Arkansas, USAhttps://2020.highedweb.org/#HEWeb20     Join us for HighEdWeb 2020, the conference created by and for higher education professionals across all departments and divisions. Together we explore and find solutions for the unique issues facing digital teams at colleges and universities. With 100+ diverse sessions, an outstanding keynote presentation, intensive workshops, and engaging networking events,…See More
Feb 19
Christine Boehler posted a discussion

HighEdWeb 2020 Call for Proposals is Open!

The 2020 Annual Conference of the Higher Education Web Professionals Association (HighEdWeb) will travel to Little Rock, Arkansas, this October 18-21 — and the call for proposals is now open! As a digital professional in higher education, we know you have great ideas and experiences to share. From developers, marketers and programmers to managers, designers, writers and all team members in-between, HighEdWeb provides valuable professional development for all who want to explore the unique…See More
Feb 14
Christine Boehler shared Sara Clark's discussion on Facebook
Feb 14
Christine Boehler is now a member of University Web Developers
Feb 14
Brian Bell joined Kevin Daum's group
Feb 14
Brian Bell joined Mark Greenfield's group
Feb 14
Kenneth George is now a member of University Web Developers
Feb 13
John Sterni is now a member of University Web Developers
Feb 6

UWEBD has been in existence for more than 10 years and is the very best email discussion list on the Internet, in any industry, on any topic

About

© 2020   Created by Mark Greenfield.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service